Crypto Rulemaking and Tokenised Securities Exemption Delayed as CLARITY Act Stalls . . Again
Updated: 6 days ago
The US Securities and Exchange Commission cancelled its 14 August open meeting, where it had been expected to propose Regulation Crypto Assets, its first formal crypto specific rulemaking, and to unveil a long anticipated innovation exemption for tokenised securities. The regulator cited an unforeseen scheduling issue and gave no new date. For UK founders and platforms watching where the rules of tokenised capital will actually settle, the more useful story is why the meeting slipped, not that it did.
The delay was not a technical hitch. White House officials were reportedly concerned that a broad SEC exemption would complicate Senate negotiations over the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act, the bill meant to draw a durable line between SEC and CFTC jurisdiction over digital assets. SEC staff were separately examining whether the agency had the legal authority, economic analysis and procedural grounding to grant relief covering such a fundamental change to how securities trade. The Senate has now filed a cloture motion on CLARITY for 15 September, a procedural vote on whether to even begin debate, not a final vote on the bill itself. Tokenisation focused stocks slid on the news.
This is a critical matter. A US innovation exemption would have let issuers move tokenised equity and debt onto blockchain rails without a bespoke rulemaking for every product, the kind of permissive shortcut that has made US platforms the loudest voice in global tokenisation headlines. Its absence, twice delayed now, leaves those platforms operating in the same patchwork of existing securities law that has governed the sector for years.
The contrast with the UK is instructive. Britain has not tried to write a single sweeping exemption. Instead the FCA and Bank of England built the Digital Securities Sandbox and the PISCES regime as live, bounded environments in which firms test issuance, trading and settlement of tokenised and private securities under existing rules, with a defined review point rather than an open ended promise. Sixteen firms are already working through the DSS toward going live, and PISCES operators including the London Stock Exchange, JP Jenkins and Asset Match have run real trading events for real companies this year. None of that required Congress or a contested exemption to get moving.
None of this means UK regulation has won. The DSS and PISCES sandboxes are still time limited experiments, due for a decision on permanent status only as they approach their 2030 deadline, and plenty of UK founders and lawyers still describe the custody and nominee questions around tokenised shares as genuinely unresolved. But the SEC's second delay this year is a useful data point in a broader argument this publication keeps returning to: founders and platforms building tokenised capital structures need regulatory clarity more than they need regulatory permissiveness. A smaller regulator moving deliberately through a bounded sandbox has, so far, delivered more usable certainty than a larger one waiting on a single sweeping rule that keeps slipping.
For UK platforms with US ambitions, the practical read is patience. The exemption that would have made cross listing tokenised UK equity into US venues simpler is not coming this month, and the CLARITY Act's own path through the Senate remains contested on ethics and enforcement provisions that have nothing to do with tokenisation itself. Founders building on UK rails do not need to wait on either.
Key Takeaways
The SEC cancelled its 14 August meeting and again delayed its innovation exemption for tokenised securities, citing White House concern that it could complicate CLARITY Act negotiations and internal doubts about its own legal authority to grant such broad relief.
The Senate's CLARITY Act cloture vote, a procedural step only, is now set for 15 September, with final passage still contested on ethics and enforcement terms.
The UK's Digital Securities Sandbox and PISCES regime, built around bounded live testing rather than a single sweeping exemption, have continued producing real tokenised trading activity without waiting on primary legislation.
For UK platforms and founders, the practical implication is that cross border tokenised issuance into the US remains constrained for now, while UK rails continue to offer a working, if still time limited, path.
Sources
How the CLARITY Act got here: timeline
May 2026: On 14 May the Senate Banking Committee passed the CLARITY Act by 15 votes to 9, with two Democrats joining Republicans, the first bipartisan committee approval of comprehensive US digital asset regulation. The bill moved to the Senate floor, where it needs 60 votes to advance. Senator Angela Alsobrooks, one of the two Democrats in favour, said: "My vote today is a vote to keep working in good faith. We still have so much work to do."
May 2026: Ahead of the markup, more than 130 amendments were filed, including 44 from Senator Elizabeth Warren. Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks agreed a stablecoin compromise permitting activity-based rewards while blocking passive yield on idle balances, which the American Bankers Association and the Bank Policy Institute rejected. Senator Cynthia Lummis warned that missing the window could push the legislation to 2030.
May 2026: On 6 May Patrick Witt, executive director of the President's Council of Advisers for Digital Assets, said the White House was targeting 4 July for Senate passage of the bill.
April 2026: The informal 25 April deadline for a Senate Banking Committee markup passed without action from Chairman Tim Scott. The same day more than 120 crypto and digital asset firms, including Coinbase, a16z, Ripple, Circle and Fidelity Digital Assets, signed a joint letter urging the committee to schedule the markup.
March 2026: A joint SEC and CFTC interpretation confirmed that tokenised securities are still securities regardless of whether they sit on a blockchain, a principle the CLARITY Act codifies and extends.
July 2025: The CLARITY Act passed the House of Representatives on 17 July 2025 by 294 votes to 134.
Frequently asked questions
Why did the SEC cancel its 14 August meeting on crypto rules?
The SEC cited an unforeseen scheduling issue and gave no new date. White House officials were reportedly concerned that a broad exemption would complicate Senate negotiations over the CLARITY Act, and SEC staff were examining whether the agency had the legal authority to grant such relief.
What is the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act?
The CLARITY Act is a US bill meant to draw a durable line between SEC and CFTC jurisdiction over digital assets. The Senate filed a cloture motion on it for 15 September, a procedural vote on whether to begin debate rather than a final vote.
What would the SEC innovation exemption for tokenised securities have done?
It would have let issuers move tokenised equity and debt onto blockchain rails without a bespoke rulemaking for every product. Its absence leaves US platforms operating under the existing patchwork of securities law.
How does the UK approach to tokenised securities differ from the US?
Rather than a single sweeping exemption, the FCA and Bank of England built the Digital Securities Sandbox and the PISCES regime as bounded live environments under existing rules. Sixteen firms are working through the DSS toward going live, though both regimes remain time limited experiments facing a decision on permanent status near their 2030 deadline.
When did the CLARITY Act pass the House and the Senate Banking Committee?
The House of Representatives passed the CLARITY Act on 17 July 2025 by 294 votes to 134. The Senate Banking Committee passed it on 14 May 2026 by 15 votes to 9, with two Democrats joining Republicans.
How many votes does the CLARITY Act need on the Senate floor?
The bill requires 60 votes to advance on the Senate floor. If the Senate passes its own version, a reconciliation process with the House bill follows.
Comments